Medicalization of Female Genital Mutilation

What is medicalization of FGM?

The medicalization of Female Genital Mutilation refers to “situations in which FGM is practiced by any category of health personnel, whether in a public or private clinic, at home or elsewhere” (World Health Organization, 2010). Doctors, assistant doctors, clinicians, nurses, midwives, trained traditional birth attendants and other personnel responsible for providing health care to the population, in both the private and public sectors, as well as retired health workers who continue to perform FGM/C. (ibid, 2010)

With the exception of Egypt, where doctors are the main practitioners of FGM, it is mostly nurses and midwives who practice FGM in countries with a high rate of medicalization of FGM (Population Council, 2017)




Where is medicalization of FGM an issue ?

According to a Population Council’s report in February 2017, this practice concerns 26% of women having suffered from FGM (meaning a total of 16 million women and girls). 91% of these operations took place in Egypt, Sudan and Nigeria. There is also a substantial rise of the medicalised practice of FGM in Guinea and Kenya (Shell-Duncan B., Njue C. and Moore Z., 2017), as well as Indonesia, Malaysia, Mali and Yemen (28toomany, 2016).

Drawing on self-reported data on medicalization from women aged 15-49 in 25 countries, we find that 74% of women who have undergone FGM/C report having been cut by a traditional practitioner. 26% of women with FGM/C – totalling nearly 15 million women – report having been cut by a medical professional. Of these, 51% live in Egypt alone, and another 34% live in Sudan. Medicalization rates, defined as the percent of FGM/C performed by a medical professional (doctor, nurse, midwife, or other health care worker), are highest in 5 countries: Egypt (38%), Sudan (67%), Guinea (15%), Kenya (15%) and Nigeria (13%). Comparing data on mothers age 15- 49 and their daughters, rates of medicalization are substantially on the rise in all of these countries with the exception of Nigeria.” (p.10)


An upward trend

To identify current trends and understand how medicalization evolves over time, it is interesting to focus on the prevalence rate according to age. In doing so, the Population Council noticed that the percentage of girls between 0 & 14 years old concerned by medicalization is systematically higher than the one for women between 15 to 49 years old. It appears that parents resort more to health care professionals to cut their daughters.

The increase is especially high in Egypt where 75% of the girls have undergone FGM practiced by a health care provider while only 15% of women are concerned, but also in Guinea where 30% of girls are concerned by medicalization against only 5% of women.

  • 28toomany, 2016, The Medicalization of FGM, Access here
  • Chege J., Askew I. and Liku J., 2001, An assessment of the alternative rites approach for encouraging abandonment of female genital mutilation in Kenya, Access here
  • El-Gibaly O. and Aziz M., 2019, Health care providers’ and mothers’ perceptions about the medicalization of female genital mutilation or cutting in Egypt: A cross-sectional qualitative study, Access here
  • Human Rights Europe, 2010, Violence Against Women: Teliwel Diallo On Female Genital Mutilation, Access here (video)
  • Jaldesa G. W. , Askew I., Njue C. and Wanjiru M., 2005, Female Genital Cutting among the Somali of Kenya and Management of its Complications, Access here
  • Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS), 2010, DHS Final Reports, Access here
  • Kenya National Bureau of Statistics Nairobi, 2014, Demographic and health Survey, Access here
  • Kimani S. and Kabiru C., Population Council, 2018, Shifts in Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: Perspectives of Families and Health Care Providers. Evidence to End FGM/C: Research to Help Women Thrive., Access here
  • Kimani S., Kabiru C. W., Mutechi-Strachan J. and Guyo J., 2020, Female genital mutilation/cutting: Emerging factors sustaining medicalization related changes in selected Kenyan communities, Access here
  • Kimani S., Muteshi J. and Jaldesa G., 2018, Medicalization of FGM/C among the Abagusii of Kenya, Access here
  • Kimani S. and Shell-Duncan B., 2018,  Medicalized Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: Contentious Practices and Persistent Debates, Access here
  • Njue C. and Askew I., 2004, Medicalization of Female Genital Cutting Among the Abagusii in Nyanza Province, Access here
  • Obianwu O., Adetunji A., Dirisu O., Population Council, 2018. “Understanding medicalisation of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C): a qualitative study of parents and health workers in Nigeria. Evidence to End FGM/C: Research to Help Women Thrive, Access here
  • Population Reference Bureau, 2018, Understanding the Impact of Medicalisation on Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting, Access here
  • PRB, 2020,  Understanding the Impact of Medicalisation on Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting, Access here     
  • Refaat A., 2009, Medicalization of female genital cutting in Egypt, Access here
  • Richard F. and Decoster K., 2016, Why we should be against the medicalisation of Female Genital Mutilation, Evidence to End FGM/C: Research to Help Girls and Women Thrive consortium Access here
  • Serour G., 2013, Medicalization of female genital mutilation / cutting,  Access here
  • Shell-Duncan B., 2001, The medicalization of female “circumcision”: harm reduction or promotion of a dangerous practice?, Access here
  • Shell-Duncan B., Njue C. and Moore Z., 2017, The Medicalization of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting:What do the Data Reveal?, Access here
  • UNICEF, 2017, Baseline Study Report: Female Genital Mutilation/ Cutting and Child Marriage among the Rendille, Access here
  • World Health Organization, 2010, Global strategy to stop health-care providers from performing female genital mutilation, Access here
  • Yussuf M., Matanda D. and Powell R. A., 2020, Exploring the capacity of the Somaliland healthcare system to manage female genital mutilation/cutting-related complications and prevent the medicalization of the practice: A cross-sectional study, Access here
  • Plus d’articles et recherches du Population Council ici

Des chiffres sur la médicalisation des MGF par pays sont également disponibles sur le site Web de l’UNICEF.


What can be done ?

Medicalization of FGM What can be done ? To be able to combat the increasing medicalization of Female Genital Mutiliation, it is first necessary to understand why health personnel agree to perform such an act … (1, 2) They belong to a community that practices FGM and...

read more

Plastic surgery and social pressure

Medicalization of FGM Plastic surgery and social pressure There was widespread discussion amongst our members on the issue of genital plastic surgery which is freely available to adult women and which is becoming increasingly popular in Europe and North America. While...

read more

Opposition to medicalisation

Medicalization of FGM Opposition to medicalisation Various arguments are put forth by detractors of medicalisation of Female Genital Mutilation. This is a practice against which the opposition is almost unanimous as we can see through the statements of various...

read more

How do we explain the medicalization?

Medicalization of FGM How do we explain the medicalization? To understand why medicalization is spreading, it is important to understand the arguments of people, including health professionals, in favour of the practice. The "lesser harm" solution: In places where the...

read more