In order to ensure community-led interventions it is crucial to work in close collaboration with local actors, including women and girl-led organisations, as well as community health workers. Experts stressed the importance of connecting and supporting existing structures and stakeholders, something that has historically been lacking when humanitarian organizations enter a crisis context. The capacity of existing stakeholders, structures and services must be reinforced and partnerships set up with local and national institutions, including Ministries. One suggestion was to create online platforms to map both existing and available services for FGM survivors and all actors working on FGM in the field. It was also stressed that governments and donors should facilitate and invest in such connections to ensure sustainability.
Another important aspect to addressing FGM in humanitarian and crisis contexts is the need to provide adequate and systematic specialised training and capacity building for organisations, at different organisational levels. This requires both sufficient financial and human resources as well as clear organisational policies and practical protocols made available to professionals.
A strong recommendation was made to reinforce the coordination among actors working on FGM in humanitarian contexts, based on the observation that organisations too often work in silos. At the country level, experts suggested creating in-country multi-stakeholder coordination platforms to share information, data and strategize interventions on FGM through periodic meetings and a continuous and open communication, as well as a shared database centralising all data and information available on FGM in that context.
“We need to make sure the humanitarian and development sectors work closer together”
The stakeholders participating in the virtual dialogue found that development and humanitarian actors often do not communicate and collaborate with each other. Therefore, they insisted on the need to implement partnerships to bridge the gap between the development and humanitarian sectors.