Lessons learnt from the discussion

What to retain of members’ contributions?

The main ideas emitted by the members during the discussion on Cross-border FGMs:

  • Reconsider and question the notion of border. Several members emphasized that many borders in Africa are “artificial”, divisions inherited from colonization, which helps explain why the practice is conducted across borders.
  • Stop thinking in terms of borders and States only in order to begin thinking in terms of communities who live and share cultures and traditions which go beyond borders. People crossing borders do not perceive themselves as “foreigners” in the country they visit. Thus, increased cooperation and collaboration is needed between countries who house the same communities.
  • Introducing border controls is not seen as an efficient or ethical solution to fight Cross-border FGM.
  • Consider law enforcement and the efficiency of controls rather than the existence or not of legislation.
  • Do not forget diasporas and migration flows which make the notion of borders less relevant in terms of FGM as some communities practice it in their host country where it is illegal.
  • Acknowledge and support local activists in communities, especially in countries where activists are strongly repressed.

 

A common issue raised by the members during the discussion was that the enforcement of laws in various countries has pushed the practice of FGM underground in several communities. Members showed that the prevalence rate of Cross Border FGM was higher in communities where the same people sharing the same culture lived across country borders.  Cross Border FGM is most likely to happen in countries with no or fragile Anti FGM laws as people travel into communities where they can escape prosecution.

 

According to the three experts – Felister Gitonga, Josephine Wouango and Natalie Robie, there are two main factors that increase cross-border FGMs’:

  • The presence of a same community but also of a family and/or home on both sides of a border
  • Differences in legislation, law enforcement and controls between neighboring countries

How to tackle this phenomenon?

In order to fight against this phenomenon, the main advice of the three experts was to put in place better collaboration and cooperation between authorities and community-based organizations, integrating members of the community. They stressed that End-FGM strategies must be adapted to each specific context and composed of a combination of approaches and actors.

 

When members were asked whether identifying people at the border who travel to practice FGM is the solution to eradicating Cross Border FGM, most members disagreed. Instead, they argued, authorities and activists need to employ other measures to tackle the issue.

“Will we not create a sentiment of « infantilization » when we question people on their reasons for traveling inside their own countries?

Should we believe in the capacity of people to self assert, through reinforcing their capacity to make decisions – Or count on controls (and fear) of the people who have the right to travel freely?”

Social worker, Belgium.

“People who cross a border do not feel like foreigners on the other side, they go to see their parents, their family that live in « the other country ». This person will not say that she is going to do a practice that is illegal in her/his country, they go because it is a practice prepared by their community [on the other side of the border].”

Educator, Senegal

“I think it’s very vital and important to do a screening of the young girls crossing into the « red zone »…the security personnel should cross examine the girls and the guardians who are crossing the borders to find out why and to what purpose …”

Activist, Kenya

 

Members both stressed the need for community education and of working towards girls’ and women’s empowerment:

“We must make sure that girls get to go to school so that they can make informed decisions on their own and educate the girls and women on FGM through the introduction of age-appropriate topics in learning institutions. Economic empowerment of women is key to enable them to be independent and not rely on men or traditional beliefs for their livelihood.”

Joycelyn Mwangi, from the Gender Rights Network, Kenya

« The Community of Practice on Female Genital Mutilation » is part of the « Building Bridges between Africa and Europe to tackle FGM » project, supported by the « UNFPA-UNICEF Joint Programme on the Elimination of FGM ».
The project is coordinated by AIDOS in partnership with GAMS Belgium.

The views expressed on this website are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the UNFPA, UNICEF or any other agency or organization.

© Copyright : GAMS Belgium